Case studies

Pallet count mismatch at shipping dock: instant alert case

Anonymous logistics hub — expected vs detected pallet count caught in real time; shipping errors down 60%.

Industry
Logistics & Warehousing
Client
Manufacturer’s shipping dock — Marmara region, Türkiye
Existing infrastructure
3 existing cameras
Pilot setup
3 working days
Measurement period
30 days
Pilot scope
Pallet counting at the shipping dock

Reported results

−60%

Shipping errors

40m→3m

Footage search

3 business days

Installation

3 existing

Cameras

This case summarizes an object-counting pilot at a manufacturer’s shipping ramp. Site name anonymous.

Pallets loaded by forklift were counted manually; ERP entry hours later. Variances surfaced only at day-end reconciliation.

Problem

Average 12 shipment variance records per week. Root cause (missing pallet, double count, wrong SKU) found by manual footage search.

Logistics lead spent 25–40 minutes per variance scanning recordings.

Solution

Three ramp cameras connected to object-count module. Each load compared expected pallets (ERP or operator input) vs AI count.

When variance exceeded 5% threshold, logistics lead got panel alert with timestamp and count summary archived.

30-day result

Weekly variance records fell from 12 to 5 (60% reduction). Footage search time averaged 3 minutes.

Lessons

Counting module often delivers fastest ROI in logistics; setup in 3 business days.

ERP integration completed in phase two — operator tablet input sufficed for pilot.

* Customer name and facility details are not shared for confidentiality. Results may vary by facility conditions.

Related solutions

Other case studies

Start with the cameras you already have

Send us a few frames from your cameras and the problem you want to solve. We will tell you honestly what is feasible.